Alternate title:Yet Another Solution to Newspapers’ Problems

Media moguls, feel free to take this idea and run with it–I have neither the capital nor the initiative to implement it.

Media pundits, feel free to bash this idea. I haven’t seen an idea out there yet that someone hasn’t hated.

So the basic idea is pretty simple–customize the news for every online reader. Well, not every online reader. How about every online reader who pays? Sounds silly, I know, but let’s think this through.

Do you have over 1,000 unread items in your feed reader? Out of those 1,000 items, how many of them do you actually want to read anyway? How many of the ones you want to read aren’t going to get read because you eventually just hit the “mark all as read” button and start fresh? Why can’t the feed reader “learn” what types of articles you like to read and keep trend information on what you read? Why can’t the feed reader put items in three categories for me–things I want to read, things I may want to read, and things I probably don’t want to read? Google, you can already do this based on the statistics you provide in Google Reader. Why haven’t you implemented this yet?

If you use Netflix, you know how great their movie suggestion engine is. It’s incredible. I can watch movies for free on TV, but I’ll pay for delivery of exactly what I want and suggestions for more of what I want.

What if we combined the ideas of a smart feed reader and a movie suggestion engine and applied them to a news organization, but with a twist. Why not create a news personalization/suggestion engine and make it available to subscribers only?

What if news organizations provided their paid subscribers with a browser toolbar that kept up with not only the articles a user reads on their site, but also other sites. All they would really need to track data on external sites is a “thumbs up, thumbs down” button similar to the one Stumbleupon provides its users. The organization that sells the subscription already has lots of metadata (data about data) on the stories they’ve published, and they can analyze data about content from other providers.

When I pull up my local newspaper‘s web site, why do I see the same front page as everyone else? If a subscriber doesn’t care about sports based on their browsing history, why show them articles about a sporting event on the front page? On the other hand, if a subscriber checks the weather 10 times a day, it would make sense to show that visitor weather on the front page every single time they log in. To that reader, weather IS ALWAYS the top story.

And this idea can be expanded. Why not aggregate the data of all the users to recommend articles from other organizations I may like? Why not point me to blog posts that are related to the stories I’ve spent time reading?

Here’s a list of RSS feeds provided by my local paper, the Knoxville News Sentinel. Am I really supposed to comb through these, subscribe to the ones that may contain articles I’d like to read, then filter through each story posted in each feed to find the articles I want to read? That’s not practical.

It would be more practical for me to pay a premium to have my own feed taylored specifically for me. It would be filtered, prioritized, and contain suggestions for offsite content. No, it’s not an easy problem. But I think it may be one worth solving.Similar Posts:

• The Hackable Guardian
• Making RSS Your Best Friend — Reading
• Is Twitter Really Killing RSS?
• Do You Really Need FeedBurner?
• Leveraging Twitter With Tweetmeme

If you’ve ever seen this little symbol that seems to be everywhere on the web and wondered what it was for, this is the article for you.

There’s a lot to say about RSS (Real Simple Syndication) with regards to writing feeds, handling multiple feeds, monetizing feeds, etc.  But if you’re reading this article you’re probably looking for a quick overview of what RSS is and not much more.  The best way to understand it is to become a user of RSS.  You’ll “get it” in no time.

And you’ll love it.  I promise.

Basically, the owner of the RSS “Feed” updates the feed every time content is added to their site.  More accurately, the software they use to update their site automatically makes this change for them.  When this happens, all of the people who “subscribe” to the feed are automatically notified of the new content.  Some people choose to subscribe by email, while others subscribe in a feed reader.  The advantage of subscribing in a reader, which is my personal choice, is that you an view all of your feeds in one place.  Imagine reading all of your favorite sites and blogs in one place.  That’s what a feed reader does for you.

That cute little symbol is the website publisher’s way of enticing you to subscribe to their feed.  In fact, you can click on ours and subscribe to our feed right now!  You’ll be given some options to choose a reader.  I like Google Reader by Google because it’s super easy to use and has a ton of features you’ll appreciate once you’ve subscribed to a bunch of feeds.  It won’t take long.

The other option many sites, including ours, give you is to subscribe by email.  This is a good option if you only want to subscribe to a few sites and get emails from them, but for a bunch of sites, you can’t beat a feed reader.Similar Posts:

• Making RSS Your Friend–Burning Multiple Feeds
• Do You Really Need FeedBurner?
• Is Twitter Really Killing RSS?
• Using Your Gmail Account For Your Domain Mail
• How News Organizations Can Get My Money