Judge In Knoxville Case Questions Media Intent

NewsTechZilla
241 Subscribers
Subscribe by email:

From today’s Knoxville News Sentinel:

(Rick) Hollow and attorney Tom McAdams, who represented WBIR-TV, Channel 10, at the hearing, argued that the judge had no legal right to deny their clients’ Internet-based readers their First Amendment right to express themselves.

McAdams deemed the space allotted on media Web sites for commentary as a “giant bulletin board,” the provision of which was a “public service.”

Hollow initially suggested the News Sentinel’s Web site didn’t even turn a buck, a claim Baumgartner immediately questioned and newspaper editor Jack McElroy quickly corrected.

“We generate revenue,” McElroy said.

“Of course you do,” the judge replied.

“I’m saying if there is a profit, there is a responsibility that goes with it. … Those are two things that bother me about your site – anonymity and no prior screening.”

At this point, I think most of us are waiting to see what Baumgartner’s ruling will be.

Background on the case can be found here.

Spread the word:
  • email
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Ping.fm
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
Tags: Knoxville, Knoxville News Sentinel, Rick Hollow, WBIR

POST A COMMENT

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*

Archives

  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • Categories

  • Categories
  • TAG CLOUD