<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The News Cycle Has Changed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.newstechzilla.com/2009/01/the-news-cycle-has-changed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.newstechzilla.com/2009/01/the-news-cycle-has-changed/</link>
	<description>Not Just Tech News...Tech FOR News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Sep 2011 16:30:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: newscoma</title>
		<link>http://www.newstechzilla.com/2009/01/the-news-cycle-has-changed/comment-page-1/#comment-290</link>
		<dc:creator>newscoma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 14:01:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newstechzilla.com/?p=645#comment-290</guid>
		<description>I couldn&#039;t agree more with both of you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I couldn&#8217;t agree more with both of you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nik Green</title>
		<link>http://www.newstechzilla.com/2009/01/the-news-cycle-has-changed/comment-page-1/#comment-289</link>
		<dc:creator>Nik Green</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 09:56:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newstechzilla.com/?p=645#comment-289</guid>
		<description>As someone who works within the newspaper industry (but not journalism) I totally agree with these sentiments. However, I fear that from what I see in my own company, editorial staff and newspaper management in the main are not  willing or wanting to accept this. 

They are fighting battles (perhaps understandably) based around keeping the existing model of news production on a printed page and management are fighting the battles of removing as many people as possible to keep artificially high profit margins (20%+)

In the meantime they have both failed to notice that as peoples appetite for news is increasing, there particular medium is decreasing. If I hear another protestation that the downturn is &#039;cyclical&#039; or that the &#039;credit crunch&#039; is the root cause of declining advertising and sales I think I&#039;ll scream. It is delusional to suppose when the economy is on the up all these advertisers will flock back to single edition printed advertisements, in the same way that people following a breaking story at 11pm on a Sunday night will wait to 1pm on Monday for the evening paper to cover it.

News has become democratised by the web, but it still needs proper punctuation and authority, which is where news(papers) organisations can add value.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As someone who works within the newspaper industry (but not journalism) I totally agree with these sentiments. However, I fear that from what I see in my own company, editorial staff and newspaper management in the main are not  willing or wanting to accept this. </p>
<p>They are fighting battles (perhaps understandably) based around keeping the existing model of news production on a printed page and management are fighting the battles of removing as many people as possible to keep artificially high profit margins (20%+)</p>
<p>In the meantime they have both failed to notice that as peoples appetite for news is increasing, there particular medium is decreasing. If I hear another protestation that the downturn is &#8216;cyclical&#8217; or that the &#8216;credit crunch&#8217; is the root cause of declining advertising and sales I think I&#8217;ll scream. It is delusional to suppose when the economy is on the up all these advertisers will flock back to single edition printed advertisements, in the same way that people following a breaking story at 11pm on a Sunday night will wait to 1pm on Monday for the evening paper to cover it.</p>
<p>News has become democratised by the web, but it still needs proper punctuation and authority, which is where news(papers) organisations can add value.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Chenoweth</title>
		<link>http://www.newstechzilla.com/2009/01/the-news-cycle-has-changed/comment-page-1/#comment-201</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Chenoweth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 11:37:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newstechzilla.com/?p=645#comment-201</guid>
		<description>&quot;Learn how to do web design. Learn how to edit videos and audio and photos. Learn how to create content. How to aggregate content. All that and more.&quot;  Great advice!

It is the &quot;all that and more&quot; that seems to be really scary. It is almost like the web design, editing, content creation, and aggregation skills are a &#039;basic&#039; expectation. Tapping into the depth of &quot;all that and more&quot; may be the only way to make oneself  indispensable.

The advantage that seasoned professionals have in the &#039;deadwood business&#039; is the richness of experience that years of journalism bring...that, cannot be taught nor can it be acquired via any plop-plop-fizz-fizz method (I know. Try telling that to a boss faced with red ink on the bottom line). The uncomfortable news is that &#039;continuing education&#039; requires an pervasive, task master emphasis on the &#039;continuing&#039; part...and that applies to both the seasoned professional and the recently graduated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Learn how to do web design. Learn how to edit videos and audio and photos. Learn how to create content. How to aggregate content. All that and more.&#8221;  Great advice!</p>
<p>It is the &#8220;all that and more&#8221; that seems to be really scary. It is almost like the web design, editing, content creation, and aggregation skills are a &#8216;basic&#8217; expectation. Tapping into the depth of &#8220;all that and more&#8221; may be the only way to make oneself  indispensable.</p>
<p>The advantage that seasoned professionals have in the &#8216;deadwood business&#8217; is the richness of experience that years of journalism bring&#8230;that, cannot be taught nor can it be acquired via any plop-plop-fizz-fizz method (I know. Try telling that to a boss faced with red ink on the bottom line). The uncomfortable news is that &#8216;continuing education&#8217; requires an pervasive, task master emphasis on the &#8216;continuing&#8217; part&#8230;and that applies to both the seasoned professional and the recently graduated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

