<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Talking About A Revolution</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.newstechzilla.com/2009/01/talking-about-a-revolution/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.newstechzilla.com/2009/01/talking-about-a-revolution/</link>
	<description>Not Just Tech News...Tech FOR News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Sep 2011 16:30:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: lovable liberal</title>
		<link>http://www.newstechzilla.com/2009/01/talking-about-a-revolution/comment-page-1/#comment-143</link>
		<dc:creator>lovable liberal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 17:55:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newstechzilla.com/?p=542#comment-143</guid>
		<description>Buying?  Paper?  Not important in the coming paradigm, which I call the news stack.  The news stack will be layers of content from different sources.  Even competitors will have to link to each other until they get their own follow-up stories posted on line.

There will still be real competition for the scoops, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Buying?  Paper?  Not important in the coming paradigm, which I call the news stack.  The news stack will be layers of content from different sources.  Even competitors will have to link to each other until they get their own follow-up stories posted on line.</p>
<p>There will still be real competition for the scoops, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: newscoma</title>
		<link>http://www.newstechzilla.com/2009/01/talking-about-a-revolution/comment-page-1/#comment-138</link>
		<dc:creator>newscoma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 01:42:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newstechzilla.com/?p=542#comment-138</guid>
		<description>Craig,
You make a good point and I think most journalists are, of course, going to want the scoop. I felt though, in this case with flooding in Washington, that it used the mean of working together for that particular story very well.
In Tennessee, I&#039;ve seen a lot of collaboration regarding the TVA coal spill.
Just a new tool to use in certain situations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Craig,<br />
You make a good point and I think most journalists are, of course, going to want the scoop. I felt though, in this case with flooding in Washington, that it used the mean of working together for that particular story very well.<br />
In Tennessee, I&#8217;ve seen a lot of collaboration regarding the TVA coal spill.<br />
Just a new tool to use in certain situations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig McGill</title>
		<link>http://www.newstechzilla.com/2009/01/talking-about-a-revolution/comment-page-1/#comment-137</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig McGill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 01:31:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newstechzilla.com/?p=542#comment-137</guid>
		<description>Yes, it&#039;s a nice tale but that&#039;s four people all with access to the same information, so in essence there&#039;s no scoop or exclusive, so buying one paper covers you.

I can see the uses, but in this day and age of homogenised copy, papers should still be pushing for the scoop - and Twitter collaboration could see it go the other way in parts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, it&#8217;s a nice tale but that&#8217;s four people all with access to the same information, so in essence there&#8217;s no scoop or exclusive, so buying one paper covers you.</p>
<p>I can see the uses, but in this day and age of homogenised copy, papers should still be pushing for the scoop &#8211; and Twitter collaboration could see it go the other way in parts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: newscoma</title>
		<link>http://www.newstechzilla.com/2009/01/talking-about-a-revolution/comment-page-1/#comment-136</link>
		<dc:creator>newscoma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 22:10:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newstechzilla.com/?p=542#comment-136</guid>
		<description>Thanks Jim. I just saw your post. I think this is a big story on news convergence. I guess I&#039;m not the only one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Jim. I just saw your post. I think this is a big story on news convergence. I guess I&#8217;m not the only one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jim voorhies</title>
		<link>http://www.newstechzilla.com/2009/01/talking-about-a-revolution/comment-page-1/#comment-135</link>
		<dc:creator>jim voorhies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 21:47:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newstechzilla.com/?p=542#comment-135</guid>
		<description>been thinking sorta about this issue and finally posted on it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>been thinking sorta about this issue and finally posted on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jimvoorhies.com &#187; Just a crazy idea maybe</title>
		<link>http://www.newstechzilla.com/2009/01/talking-about-a-revolution/comment-page-1/#comment-134</link>
		<dc:creator>jimvoorhies.com &#187; Just a crazy idea maybe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 21:46:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newstechzilla.com/?p=542#comment-134</guid>
		<description>[...] Something kinda-sorta related to this has been running through the back of my mind a few days. I&#8217;ve been wondering what smaller papers will do - not to mention big ones - there&#8217;s not enough local stuff going on unless you give everybody on the arrest and divorce lists a paragraph or three and near-local TV stations can scoop almost everyone in conventional media - so small papers are stuck. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Something kinda-sorta related to this has been running through the back of my mind a few days. I&#8217;ve been wondering what smaller papers will do &#8211; not to mention big ones &#8211; there&#8217;s not enough local stuff going on unless you give everybody on the arrest and divorce lists a paragraph or three and near-local TV stations can scoop almost everyone in conventional media &#8211; so small papers are stuck. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

